Feature Requests

Add support for conflict resolution: --conflict-resolve string Automatically resolve conflicts by preferring the version that is: none, path1, path2, newer, older, larger, smaller (default: none) (default "none")

Ur rclone type for connection of Google/ OneDriVery troublesome, I configured on the phone all day and still encountered all kinds of incomprehensible problems and finally failed, There may be no problem on the computer but you need to keep the Internet connected to start the service, which is extremely difficult, I hope you can apply for the relevant Drive api permission with Google and Microsoft, directly log into the authentication of my Google / Microsoft account can be directly synchronized to use sync management. I really hate Rclone right now. It's a lot of trouble and it's always having problems and failure. I find it hard to accept. 😟 , really really please!

At the moment when user enables E2E encryption for S3 back-ends (or S3Drive storage) UI updates between devices are encrypted using the user's defined encryption key. Rclone crypt back-end on the other hand, doesn't expose the encrypted data to S3Drive (only decrypted data is shown) and as such S3Drive operates on decrypted data. This could be improved by extracting the encryption passphrase from the user's config, deriving the encryption key and encrypting/decrypting the UI updates on both ends.

We should encourage users to enable encryption by default. We should detect if bucket which is being set up previously used encryption and prompt user to set it up.

Allow supporting multiple mounts. In such case user could also mix their S3 mounts, with Rclone mounts and managed account (S3Drive) mounts.

Add support for both enterprise and non-enterprise login to S3Drive.

Provide a sync option which would allow to achieve similar concept as Wasabi Cloud NAS: https://wasabi.com/cloud-nas/ Such sync option would keep track of "file accessed" metadata and based on settings (e.g. 90 days) would move file from local location to cloud/S3. Whenever file is accessed it would be stored in local FS cache. If file gets added it would end up in local FS cache and get synced automatically to remote. On top of that we would provide FUSE mount, which would use the existing selected local FS as a cache. User would have to use FUSE mount in order to gain access to all files / unlimited storage. They would have to be instructed to actually not use the local FS, as it would only aim as a local cache. It would be possible to run S3Drive on a server, create FUSE mount and then share it via SMB/Webdav in which case the end users would be able to share storage. Alternatively each user could work with their local FUSE mount, but any changes could be synced online via AMQ or other queue/notify mechanism). Some resources: https://forum.rclone.org/t/solved-is-it-possible-to-access-my-rclone-mount-as-a-samba-share/18335/27 https://www.reddit.com/r/linuxquestions/comments/rkmhv0/is_it_possible_to_share_fuse_mounts_over_samba/ https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-hardware/drivers/ifs/about-file-system-filter-drivers https://wasabi.com/cloud-nas/ Based on user's feedback: https://discord.com/channels/1069654792902815845/1069654792902815848/1148261916846850108

Continuation of: https://s3drive.canny.io/feature-requests/p/video-thumbnail-support